2020 Fantasy Baseball Player Rankings 41-50: The case for and against on Draft Day

The 2020 Fantasy baseball draft prep season is here, and this year’s player pool might take some getting used to. Starting pitchers are going earlier than ever in early drafts, and stolen bases are more valuable than ever, which means if you haven’t been paying attention, you could be surprised by how drafts are unfolding right now.

We’re here to help you get acclimated. We’ve got our position previews and tiers elsewhere, but if you really want to start your Fantasy baseball prep right, this is the place to begin: With our breakdown of the top-200 players for 2020, based on CBS Fantasy baseball expert Scott White’s rankings. Scott White and Chris Towers have broken down every player in the list, giving you the case for drafting them and the case against, so you can make up your own mind on whether you want them on your team.

We’re going through No. 41-50, looking at some big names hoping to return to their former glory.

The Case For/The Case Against

No. 41-50

The Case For: Albies did a better job of staying within himself in his second full big-league season, putting together a stat line that’s especially impressive when you consider his 22 years of age. He’s a whole-is-greater-than-the-sum-of-his-parts type, making worthwhile contributions across the board without dominating in any one category, though his best may be batting average, which is bolstered by his low strikeout rate and line-drive approach.

The Case Against: Particularly in Rotisserie leagues, big totals are what move the needle, and that’s just not Albies’ game. Given his early-round price tag, Albies is a decidedly unsexy pick, and his stock heavily relies on him delivering another 15 steals. When the threshold is that low, the margin for error is equally low, so even a mildly disappointing contribution in that category could have a significant impact on his value.

The Case For: You need steals, right? Merrifield has led the AL in them two of the past three years, and getting that sort of contribution from the relatively weak second base spot sets you up nicely to load up on big bats at the positions that offer more of them. It’s worth noting that Merrifield himself is no slouch at the plate, having hit .300 with double-digit home runs in back-to-back years. And because he has emerged as one of the game’s preeminent line-drive hitters, ranking up there with Freddie Freeman, those contributions appear to be pretty safe.

The Case Against: What may not be safe are the stolen bases themselves. I mentioned Merrifield led the AL two of the past three years? Last year was the year he didn’t, finishing with only 20, and worse yet, he was caught on one-third of his attempts. He’s 31 now, so he may have reached the stage in his career when he’ll be asked to run less. And since stolen bases are his main appeal, that would be a problem.

The Case For: Dogged by back issues in recent years, Kershaw managed to make it through 2019 unscathed (well, apart from missing the first couple weeks with shoulder inflammation), which quieted some of the decline talk. Some of the skills that had appeared to diminish showed signs of recovery, too. His swinging-strike rate was back up to 15th among qualifiers — better than teammate Walker Buehler, actually — and he was back to striking out more than a batter per inning. Seven-inning starts remained a common occurrence, and there really wasn’t a point in the year when anyone had reason to doubt his ace standing.

The Case Against: OK, so he skated by for another year, but there are still some red flags. He’s an actual soft-tosser now, averaging just 90 mph on his fastball. It means he’s giving up harder contact, which is of course never good in this environment, so you have to expect the career worst home run rate will keep going up. He may have already had some good luck in that regard, as his 3.50 xFIP and 3.77 SIERA attest.

The Case For: Nola, like many of his ace brethren, had trouble adapting to the lower seams on the baseballs in April, but once he found his groove in May, he was back to delivering high-end numbers, specifically a 2.96 ERA, 1.13 WHIP and 10.2 K/9 over the next four months. He was no stranger to the seventh inning, making it there 17 times in his 34 starts, and it’s that sort of workload that helps set him apart even in a year when the ratios aren’t as strong. We shouldn’t lose sight of the upside either: He finished third in a crowded NL Cy Young race two years ago.

The Case Against: How sneaky of me to leave out September when describing Nola’s turnaround, referring to only “the next four months.” He had a 6.51 ERA in that fifth and final month, and that sour taste will be a lasting one for many. Though he remained efficient in terms of pitch counts, Nola’s control wasn’t as pinpoint as we came to know it to be at the start of his big-league career. Whether or not it’s a grip issue, another side effect of the lower seams on the baseballs, is a matter of speculation.

The Case For: You remember 2018, right? Snell was a revelation then, claiming the AL Cy Young despite a workload disadvantage because a 1.89 ERA is just bonkers in today’s hitting environment. Well, many of the attributes that contributed to that 1.89 ERA were just as present in 2019. He was actually a superior bat-misser, delivering a swinging-strike rate that would have been a distant first among qualifiers (with Gerrit Cole, Max Scherzer and Justin Verlander being the next three, in case you’re wondering), and his 3.31 xFIP certainly wasn’t out of line with the 3.16 mark he produced in 2018.

The Case Against: There are the theoretical stats, and then there are the actual stats. And while Snell may have measured up in the former in 2019, he most certainly did not in the latter. Sure, injuries were partly to blame — whenever he seemed to be finding his groove, his elbow would start barking, ultimately requiring surgery to remove loose bodies — but they only contribute to the durability issues already holding him back. Only twice in his 23 starts did he exceed six innings last year, and seeing as he finished with only 107 innings, you have to assume the Rays will baby him yet again.

The Case For: At the most volatile but most essential of positions, Greinke has been a model of consistency, only once in the past seven years delivering an ERA over 3.21 and only twice falling short of 200 innings. He pounds the strike zone, seems to get better the third time through the lineup and thrives on being the opposite of everything hitters are used to seeing these days. And now beginning his first full year with the Astros, he has an easy path to a big win total as well.

The Case Against: For as reliable as Greinke has been, there’s always a sense he’s hanging by a thread, and now that he’s 36, there may be more truth to it than ever. He has had to make do with less and less on his fastball in recent years, and one of these years when he shows up to spring training throwing 82 mph, he won’t have as easy a time getting it back. For all the ways he’s an ace, he falls short in the strikeout column, which can put you at a disadvantage in a Rotisserie league if you don’t draft a couple big arms ahead of him.

The Case For: Morton is as good as most of the pitchers going two to three rounds ahead of him. He didn’t lose anything upon leaving the Astros, and he actually posted a career-best strikeout rate, along with his lowest walk rate since 2012. Morton also got close to 200 innings for the first time in his career and also threw at least six innings in 22 of his 33 starts. With two near-elite seasons in a row under his belt, Morton looks like a steal at his current cost.

The Case Against: He’s 35, and 2019 was just the second time he’s ever even thrown 170 innings in a season. That might be overstating his durability issues just a tad — Morton has made at least 28 starts in three straight seasons — but it’s hard to ignore his track record and age. Morton could have another great season or two left in him, but you’re betting against history, both his own and the population as a whole. There’s great upside here, but there is also a tremendous amount of risk. 

The Case For: Stolen bases. Even in all those instances when his playing time fluctuated and his bat failed to deliver, Villar has been one of the most reliable contributors in that ever-elusive category, swiping at least 35 bags in three of the past four seasons (and 23 in the other). Those numbers are pretty valuable on their own in Rotisserie leagues, and then when he has a year like last year when he really does perform at the plate, it’s enough to move him into the elites in that format. The Marlins made a point to acquire him this offseason and thus figure to be more deliberate in their use of him than maybe some of his previous organizations were.

The Case Against: Of course, the biggest reason the Marlins acquired Villar is because he was dirt cheap. The Orioles were willing to waive him if they didn’t find a taker, which tells you a little about what they thought of his chances for a repeat. Even with the changing dimensions, Marlins Park projects to be a much different venue than Camden Yards, where Villar hit two-thirds of his home runs last year. And considering he had just a .249 xBA and .313 xwOBA, his production was due for a downturn anyway. If he doesn’t hit the ground running, the rebuilding Marlins might turn over Villar’s at-bats to someone younger or trade him to be a reserve for a contender.  -Scott White

The Case For: The former Rookie of the Year and MVP recovered from an injury-plagued 2018 to deliver numbers more befitting his profile. Of course, the numbers didn’t exactly stand out in such a power-laden environment, but they didn’t invite much criticism either. His plus on-base skills give him a higher run-scoring capacity than the average slugger, too.

The Case Against: Obviously, Bryant is still a quality contributor, but it’s getting harder to remember a time when a player with his profile justified a first-round pick. The redundancies are plentiful at third base in particular, and at this point, it’s not clear that he has an upside advantage either. He doesn’t hit the ball especially hard for someone who’s chiefly a home run hitter, and it means he may not have the capacity for much more than the 31 he hit last year. In fact, his xBA and xwOBA both suggest he actually overachieved, and by no small degree.

The Case For: A model of consistency, Rizzo actually delivered the highest batting average (.293) and second-highest OPS (.924) of his career last year, not that either was some great departure. His profile is remarkably stable, his expected stats matching up with his actual ones virtually every year, and at least in points leagues, his lack of strikeouts serves as its own differentiator. His on-base skills make him as capable a run-scorer as he is a run-producer, a trait he shares with other elite first basemen.

The Case Against: The number of traits Rizzo shares with other elite first basemen is becoming scarcer. At a time when home run totals are on the rise across the league, Rizzo’s have been on the decline. A high-dollar corner infielder has to be able to deliver 30 in this environment, and in back-to-back years now, Rizzo hasn’t. Steady as he is, he may not be enough of a standout at anything else to make up for it, at least in 5×5 Rotisserie leagues. The gap between his value in that format and in Head-to-Head points has never been greater.

So which sleepers should you snatch in your draft? And which undervalued first baseman can help you win a championship? Visit SportsLine now to get rankings for every single position, all from the model that called Kenta Maeda’s huge breakout last season, and find out.

Source link