Wednesday, September 28, 2022

It appears to be for usage with specific verbs or perhaps in a particular feeling of brand new verb

It appears to be for usage with specific verbs or perhaps in a particular feeling of brand new verb

/bi-/ might have been advertised to own locative-terminative push as opposed to strictly locative push getting /ba-/, however, Thomsen says to the p. 184, this “may perhaps be not immediately utilized for the reason off concord that have an effective loc.-term. or loc. noun, however it instead suits the latest semantic distinction of verb. “

>ba(I): has good separative mode. In OBGT they closely correlates which have >Akkadian t-stems. (Thomsen, adopting the Jacobsen, confuses t-stems >with the Akkadian best.) The reputation was once the fresh new ventive >marker yards and therefore the b was absorbed: m-ba- > m-ma, whenever this is exactly >with a second people pronoun, it becomes yards-ma > m-mu (very ba >is not always easy to recognize). Regarding the lack of the fresh >ventive marker they uses up the initial status regarding the strings, immediately after which it >cannot always be popular regarding ba(II). An obvious circumstances are >ba-ne-su8-be2-dentro de-de3-durante = ni-it-tal2-lak cu-nu-ci = i disappear completely >on them (OBGT VII, 305). > >ba(II): have a great stative/inactive form. Inside OBGT VI, it’s made from the >a c-stalk stative/couch potato, or a keen Nt-stem passive. Apparently, ba(II) >uses up the first standing regarding chain. ba-ab-gar, ba-ab-gar-re-durante >= cuckun, cuckunaku = they have already been placed / I was place >(of the someone unnamed). The fresh new models ba-gar, ba-gar-re-en, . ba-na-gar, >ba-na-gar-re-dentro de during the OBGT VI, contours 160-165, are confusing; capable >rather be translated while the ba(I), particularly the 2nd show, >that is a couple of-participant, and the OB grammarian, who made them >from the Nt-stem passives, at the same time kept the fresh new ambiguity. > >Your report clearly relates to ba(II), but I really don’t think it is simply a good >case of taste, just after one has lay ba(I) apart. Naturally, it is >method beyond my personal information and you may my competence to check my personal significantly more than >syntactical/lexical states from the unilingual messages. > >Using my all the best, >Peter J. Huber

I imagined of all of the intransitive sentences that stop which have ba-Options, instance ba-gul, what is glint “it had been shed”. Since you say, the individuals fall in the course regarding ba(II).

I might enjoys thought it was a good >Hebrew phrase, but then once again, I’m not sure the relationship of the Sumerian >language while the Hebrew language

Thank you for taking the time to try and describe so it point. I am able to attempt to outline what Hayes has on pages 162 and you can 256: He believes you to students has actually speculated there can be a couple ba- conjugation prefixes which can be homonyms. “A person is seen mainly inside couch potato phrases, another in the faster definable contexts.” Together with, the brand new conjugation prefix bi2- possibly happens with moderate phrases on locative-terminative case in addition to conjugation prefix ba- either happens having affordable sentences in the locative circumstances. “It is primarily the pattern away from co-thickness that has led numerous students to summarize that bi2- and you can ba- are not of the identical rating as the most other conjugation prefixes, and they are most likely composed of one or more ability.” Thus one to type of ba- range between a feature you to definitely signifies the brand new locative case. Getting an effective separative meaning, you would expect to acquire Sumerian affordable phrases ending for the ablative postposition -ta.

Mention the fresh understated differences >manufactured in OBGT VI, traces 79-84, involving the ordinary Grams-stem stative >and C-stalk stative/passive: an-gar, an-gar-re-dentro de = cakin, >caknaku = he could be put, I am put, against

>I became questioning for many who you’ll answer a concern for me. You will find realize someplace >the label “Eden” is actually an excellent Sumerian word. > >At the very least, in the event that Eden, Adam, and/or Eve try Sumerian terms and conditions, can you >excite tell me whether they have an interpretation/definition?

EDIN are a good Sumerian word, it refers to the steppe homes between the two rivers, where in fact the herd animals grazed.

Related articles



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share article

Latest articles


Subscribe to stay updated.