Wednesday, September 28, 2022

It appears to be for usage with specific verbs or perhaps in a particular feeling of brand new verb

It appears to be for usage with specific verbs or perhaps in a particular feeling of brand new verb

/bi-/ might have been advertised to own locative-terminative push as opposed to strictly locative push getting /ba-/, however, Thomsen says to the p. 184, this “may perhaps be not immediately utilized for the reason off concord that have an effective loc.-term. or loc. noun, however it instead suits the latest semantic distinction of verb. “

>ba(I): has good separative mode. In OBGT they closely correlates which have >Akkadian t-stems. (Thomsen, adopting the Jacobsen, confuses t-stems >with the Akkadian best.) The reputation was once the fresh new ventive >marker yards and therefore the b was absorbed: m-ba- > m-ma, whenever this is exactly >with a second people pronoun, it becomes yards-ma > m-mu (very ba >is not always easy to recognize). Regarding the lack of the fresh >ventive marker they uses up the initial status regarding the strings, immediately after which it >cannot always be popular regarding ba(II). An obvious circumstances are >ba-ne-su8-be2-dentro de-de3-durante = ni-it-tal2-lak cu-nu-ci = i disappear completely >on them (OBGT VII, 305). > >ba(II): have a great stative/inactive form. Inside OBGT VI, it’s made from the >a c-stalk stative/couch potato, or a keen Nt-stem passive. Apparently, ba(II) >uses up the first standing regarding chain. ba-ab-gar, ba-ab-gar-re-durante >= cuckun, cuckunaku = they have already been placed / I was place >(of the someone unnamed). The fresh new models ba-gar, ba-gar-re-en, . ba-na-gar, >ba-na-gar-re-dentro de during the OBGT VI, contours 160-165, are confusing; capable >rather be translated while the ba(I), particularly the 2nd show, >that is a couple of-participant, and the OB grammarian, who made them >from the Nt-stem passives, at the same time kept the fresh new ambiguity. > >Your report clearly relates to ba(II), but I really don’t think it is simply a good >case of taste, just after one has lay ba(I) apart. Naturally, it is >method beyond my personal information and you may my competence to check my personal significantly more than >syntactical/lexical states from the unilingual messages. > >Using my all the best, >Peter J. Huber

I imagined of all of the intransitive sentences that stop which have ba-Options, instance ba-gul, what is glint “it had been shed”. Since you say, the individuals fall in the course regarding ba(II).

I might enjoys thought it was a good >Hebrew phrase, but then once again, I’m not sure the relationship of the Sumerian >language while the Hebrew language

Thank you for taking the time to try and describe so it point. I am able to attempt to outline what Hayes has on pages 162 and you can 256: He believes you to students has actually speculated there can be a couple ba- conjugation prefixes which can be homonyms. “A person is seen mainly inside couch potato phrases, another in the faster definable contexts.” Together with, the brand new conjugation prefix bi2- possibly happens with moderate phrases on locative-terminative case in addition to conjugation prefix ba- either happens having affordable sentences in the locative circumstances. “It is primarily the pattern away from co-thickness that has led numerous students to summarize that bi2- and you can ba- are not of the identical rating as the most other conjugation prefixes, and they are most likely composed of one or more ability.” Thus one to type of ba- range between a feature you to definitely signifies the brand new locative case. Getting an effective separative meaning, you would expect to acquire Sumerian affordable phrases ending for the ablative postposition -ta.

Mention the fresh understated differences >manufactured in OBGT VI, traces 79-84, involving the ordinary Grams-stem stative >and C-stalk stative/passive: an-gar, an-gar-re-dentro de = cakin, >caknaku = he could be put, I am put, against

>I became questioning for many who you’ll answer a concern for me. You will find realize someplace >the label “Eden” is actually an excellent Sumerian word. > >At the very least, in the event that Eden, Adam, and/or Eve try Sumerian terms and conditions, can you >excite tell me whether they have an interpretation/definition?

EDIN are a good Sumerian word, it refers to the steppe homes between the two rivers, where in fact the herd animals grazed.

Related articles

Comments

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share article

Latest articles

Newsletter

Subscribe to stay updated.