Ranking MLB’s top 100 players with 2020 season on hold: Cole, deGrom battle for top pitcher’s spot

Because of the ongoing novel coronavirus pandemic, we don’t yet know when the 2020 regular season will grace us with its presence. Despite all that prevailing uncertainty, the time has come to rank the top 100 players in baseball for 2020.

The rankings you’ll soon be yelling about are based upon reasonable expectations, using things like age, trajectory, scouting profile, and recent performance history to arrive at those expectations. In essence, we’re making educated guesses at which players will provide the most value in the 2020 season (and the 2020 season alone — we’re not concerned with how these players project for 2021 and beyond). While a player’s performance in 2019 is very relevant to these rankings, it’s not the sole consideration. Again, these are in essence predictions of which players will be the very best in the season to come, and there’s more to it than just eyeballing last year’s outputs.

As for what matters, with position players it’s a mix of batting, defense, and baserunning. On offense, we’re not concerned with things like RBI. Getting on base and hitting for power matter above all, as do playing time, context of the player’s home ballpark, and production relative to positional peers (e.g., the offensive bar is lower for shortstops and catchers than it is for first basemen and DHs). For pitchers, run prevention and workload will be the drivers, but we’ll also give some consideration to underlying fundamental indicators like strikeouts and walks. Also, we’re ranking players based on actual baseball considerations as opposed to anything having anything to do with fantasy (although there’s obviously some overlap).

Above all, remember that this is Internet Street, and only righteous grievances live here. 











Outraged by that upon which you have just laid eyes? Of course you are! As always, reach out to the author at his personal email address — hotmail@hotmail.jpg — with all your complaints.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *